It’s been almost a week since I have watched my second Stanley Kubrick film, 1980’s The Shining. Why have I waited nearly a week to post my review? Well work has kept me away from thinking about it in great detail, but also because I just don’t really have a clue what to say about this movie. Sure, I can do my normal thing and just say “I liked this movie. I think it was well directed, Jack Nicholson was great, and it was a great thriller worthy of everyone’s time.” But I feel like that is not doing it justice, and I wanted to understand it more. And therein lies the problem: I just… don’t understand some of the things that happen during this movie. Stephen King’s story just perplexes me. I can follow a lot of the movie, and sometimes I can draw conclusions based on what the story is telling me. But then there are other things that are completely over my head, and I would love it if someone would be able to help me out with that.
I’ll get to my review, but I have a few things that I just cannot figure out: The ending, of course, was so bizarre, and I just have no way of knowing what it meant. I did some research and discovered a possible solution, and it makes a lot of sense, and made me realize just how good one of the dialogues was in the movie was (the one between Jack and Delbert Grady in the bathroom). Also, why was a bulldog-face guy giving fellatio to that gentleman? And why could Wendy see the things that her son Daniel could see, and why could Jack see things too? Dementia? Cabin fever? The Shining? Maybe. But nonetheless, as I watching this movie I kept saying “Alright, I am starting to get this” only to have my mind change by the next scene. But all this, of course, does not mean I dislike it.
Like I said, The Shining was excellently directed. Oddly enough, Kubrick was nominated for a Razzie Award for the movie, leading me to believe that the movie did not take off right away. His direction added to the suspenseful story that Stephen King wrote, who has been known to go for the abnormal when it comes to his horror stories, such as mutant dogs, evil cars, and sinister clowns. It might be over my head sometimes, but it is still enjoyable to watch. It wasn’t a scary movie, really, it was definitely a thriller. The hedge maze was just the perfect device for making me sit on the edge of my seat. Jack Nicholson was great as well. At first I thought his character of Jack Torrance was boring, but when he went crazy, he REALLY went crazy. His acting was very believable, and it was fun to watch, because as you may or may not know, I love watching the bad guys. However, on the bad side: Shelley Duvall. Wow, she ranged from annoying to stiff during the movie. She was nominated for Worst Actress at the same awards show, and she probably could have won it if not for Brooke Shields in Blue Lagoon. Thank goodness for Nicholson and also for Scatman Crothers as Dick Hallorann, as both of them were very good actors and helped even it out.
So at least for the purposes of my blog, I can say “You should watch this, if you have not already, because it is an example of a true classic in this genre”. I’m sure most of you have at this point, as this blog is quickly changing and it should probably be called “Hey! Look at the GREAT movie Mike Night hasn’t watched yet!” But I am home for the weekend, and I already have a couple newer movies lined up to review.
Final review: “It’s very Stephen King-y.”